Skip to main content

Facebook bows to Singapore's 'fake news' law



Facebook has added a correction notice to a post that Singapore’s government said contained false information.
It is the first time Facebook has issued such a notice under the city-state’s controversial “fake news” law.
Singapore claimed the post, by fringe news site States Times Review (STR), contained “scurrilous accusations”.
The note issued by the social media giant said it “is legally required to tell you that the Singapore government says this post has false information”.
Facebook’s addition was embedded at the bottom of the original post, which was not altered. It was only visible to social media users in Singapore.
In an emailed statement to the BBC, Facebook said it had applied a label to a post “determined by the Singapore government to contain false information”, as required under the “fake news” law.
The company — which has its Asia headquarters in the city-state — said it hoped assurances that the law would not impact on free expression “will lead to a measured and transparent approach to implementation”.

How did we get here?


The States Times Review post contained accusations about the arrest of an alleged whistleblower and election-rigging.
The government said no one had been arrested, and accused the STR of making “scurrilous accusations against the elections department, the prime minister, and the election process in Singapore”.
Authorities ordered editor Alex Tan to correct the post but the Australian citizen refused, saying he would “ not comply with any order from a foreign government”.
Authorities then called on Facebook to “publish a correction notice” in line with the “fake news” law passed earlier this year.

What is the ‘fake news’ law?


The law, known as the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation bill, came into effect in October.
It allows the government to order online platforms to remove and correct what it deems to be false statements that are “against the public interest”.
A person found guilty of doing this in Singapore could be fined heavily and face a prison sentence of up to five years.
The law also bans the use of fake accounts or bots to spread fake news — this carries penalties of up to S$1m (£563,000, $733,700) and a jail term of up to 10 years.

What’s been said about it?


Critics say the law threatens freedom of expression. Amnesty International said it would “give authorities unchecked powers to clamp down on online views of which it disapproves”.
But Singapore’s law minister said free speech “should not be affected by this bill”, adding that it was aimed only at tackling “falsehoods, bots, trolls and fake accounts”.
The government has argued that the law safeguards against abuse of power by allowing judicial reviews of its orders.

Has anyone else been affected?


Singapore’s government invoked the law for the first time on Monday to order opposition politician Brad Bowyer to correct a Facebook post questioning the independence of state investment funds.
Mr Bowyer complied, adding a note to the post saying it “contains false statements of fact”.
On the same day, Mr Bowyer wrote a new post saying he was “not against being asked to make clarifications or corrections especially if it is in the public interest”.
But on Thursday, Mr Bowyer clarified his earlier statement, saying: “Although I have no problems in following the law…that does not mean that I agree with the position they are taking or admit to any false statements on my part.”
He also said that, under the law, he must post the correction notice “regardless of whether I make an appeal”.

Originally published at https://www.bbc.com on November 30, 2019.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Babuk ransomware is back, uses new version on corporate networks

  After announcing their exit from the ransomware business in favor of data theft extortion, the Babuk gang appears to have slipped back into their old habit of encrypting corporate networks. The criminals are currently using a new version of their file-encrypting malware and have moved the operation to a new leak site that lists a handful of victims. Gang’s still in the game The Babuk ransomware group became known at the beginning of the year but the gang says that their attacks had started in mid-October 2020, targeting companies across the world and demanding ransoms typically between $60,000 and $85,000 in bitcoin cryptocurrency. In some cases, victims were asked hundreds of thousands for data decryption. One of their most publicized victims is the Washinton DC’s Metropolitan Police Department (MPD). This attack likely pushed the threat actor into announcing its retirement from the ransomware business only to adopt another extortion model that did not include encryption....
Post a Comment
Read more

Ransomware's Dangerous New Trick Is Double-Encrypting Your Data

  Ransomware groups have always taken a more-is-more approach . If a victim pays a ransom and then goes back to business as usual-hit them again. Or don’t just encrypt a target’s systems; steal their data first, so you can threaten to leak it if they don’t pay up. The latest escalation? Ransomware hackers who encrypt a victim’s data twice at the same time. Double-encryption attacks have happened before, usually stemming from two separate ransomware gangs compromising the same victim at the same time. But antivirus company Emsisoft says it is aware of dozens of incidents in which the same actor or group intentionally layers two types of ransomware on top of each other. “The groups are constantly trying to work out which strategies are best , which net them the most money for the least amount of effort,” says Emsisoft threat analyst Brett Callow. “So in this approach you have a single actor deploying two types of ransomware. The victim decrypts their data and discovers it’s not act...
Post a Comment
Read more

Linux For Apple M1 Macs is Finally Here, Thanks To Corellium

  Just when we thought that Desktop/Notebooks on ARM chipsets doesn’t make any sense, Apple came up with a revolutionary chipset M1 and showed the world what it’s capable of. Unlike other Mac counterparts with Intel CPUs, M1 lacked the ability to run Linux, until yesterday. Thanks to Corellium, running Linux for M1 Macs is now possible. The company known for winning a lawsuit against Apple has finally created its own Linux OS for M1 Macs. This certainly opens doors for other Linux communities to do the same. Corellium’s Linux For M1 Macs Is In Early Beta Stages Creator of Linux, Linus Torvalds, wanted M1 Macbook Air to run Linux , and it’s finally a reality. Corellium’s CTO, Chris Wade, tweeted yesterday that Corellium’s Linux OS is available and is in very early beta stages. Adding to that, he also warned users to go ahead with the installation only if they know what they’re doing. More details about the “full release with USB” were supposed to be revealed today, but there’s ...
Post a Comment
Read more